[20030701]RS21559_Entergy LouisianaInc.诉路易斯安那州公共服务委员会：联邦能源监管委员会命令的先发制人效力.pdf

116 U.S.C. 824(b).216 U.S.C. 824d(a).3Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. Mississippi ex rel. Moore, 487 U.S. 354 (1988); NantahalaPower & Light Co. v. Thornburg, 476 U.S. 953 (1986).4The filed rate doctrine states that “interstate power rates filed with FERC or fixed by FERCmust be given binding effect by state utility commissions determining intrastate rates.”Nantahala Power & Light, at 962. The filed rate doctrine applies to state regulators because ofthedoctrineoffederalpreemptionassetforthintheConstitutionsSupremacyClause. ArkansasLouisiana Gas Co. v. Hall, 453 U.S. 571, 581-582 (1981).Congressional Research Service The Library of CongressCRS Report for CongressReceived through the CRS WebOrder Code RS21559July 1, 2003Entergy Louisiana, Inc. v. Louisiana PublicService Commission: Preemptive Effect ofFederal Energy Regulatory CommissionOrdersMichael V. SeitzingerLegislative AttorneyAmerican Law DivisionSummaryIn Entergy Louisiana, Inc. v. Louisiana Public Service Commission the UnitedStates Supreme Court faced the issue of whether a Federal Energy RegulatoryCommission (FERC) tariff delegating discretion to the regulated entity to determineprecisecostallocationpre-emptedaFERCordert